The Euromaidan was captured by several agents, all of whom participated in the uprising and contributed to its success, but who were very far from representing the whole range of forces involved or the motivations that drove ordinary Ukrainians to support Euromaidan. These are, in a sense, deficient revolutions: they create a revolutionary legitimacy that can then be hijacked by agents who are not actually representative of the interests of the revolutionary participants. The Maidan revolutions in Ukraine-the 2014 Euromaidan was the last of the three-were similar. Instead they were mobilizations that helped to replace the elites, but where the new elites were actually factions of the same class. footnote 1 These were not upheavals that led to fundamental social changes in the class structure-nor even in the political structure of the state. As my colleague Oleg Zhuravlev and I have written, it shared features with other post-Soviet uprisings and also with those of the Arab Spring in 2011. T he euromaidan was not a rupture in the sense of a social revolution. What type of rupture did this represent? What new forces entered the arena, and what happened to the old ones? Your research has focussed on the transformations of the Ukrainian political field since the 2014 Maidan uprising.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |