When the R9 290 first launched it was just a few percent faster than the GTX 780 and when the 390 arrived it delivered around 10% more performance than the 290 on average, so it seems over the years that margin has basically doubled.įor the margins to have remained similar, we would expect to see the GTX 780 averaging 70fps at 1080p and not 64fps.Īs a reminder, the 22 games we tested are all modern releases, so for comparison's sake, let's take a look back at a couple of older titles using today's drivers. Not only that, but compared to the R9 390 it was 20% slower. In the 22 games we tested, the GTX 780 was on average 23% faster than the GTX 1050 Ti but 15% slower than the RX 470 and GTX 970. For those running a 780, you will require a 500 watt power supply to avoid running into any problems. The GTX 780 wasn't much faster than the 1050 Ti in many of the games tested, yet it increased total system consumption by almost 140%. I get that the GTX 780 is an older GPU but it still consumes quite a bit more power, increasing total system consumption by 11%. Two weeks ago we revisited the R9 390 and some of you gave the card a hard time over its power consumption.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |